Skip to main content

Supreme Court To Make Every State's Gun Laws Just Like Texas

By: Wes Messamore
The Humble Libertarian


(THL) It's been a great decade for Second Amendment gun rights supporters in the United States and it's about to get better.

In 2008 the Supreme Court decided in District of Columbia v. Heller that the District of Columbia’s ban on handguns was unconstitutional, and in this case the Supreme Court established for the first time in history a Second Amendment right to bear arms for the purpose of self defense.

In 2010 the Supreme Court decided in McDonald v. Chicago to "incorporate" the Second Amendment right to bear arms for self defense through the 14th Amendment to apply as a restriction on state and city violations of the right to bear arms as well.

In 2012 a federal district court in Maryland decided in Woollard v. Sheridan that the right to own a gun for self defense, upheld in Heller, and incorporated with a guarantee against state and local intrusion in McDonald, also extends outside the home.

And now the U.S. Supreme Court, already the friendliest Court to gun rights in history before the two Trump appointments, is taking up a case in New York to decide if the right to bear arms extends outside the home. They will most assuredly decide it does.

When this happens, the entire United States will become like Texas or a number of other shall-issue states in which concealed carry permits to carry a concealed firearm outside of the house are issued to anyone who meets the determinate criteria with no requirement to prove that they need a firearm for any reason and no discretion of local bureaucrats to deny permits.

I'll be looking forward to seeing if the rest of American society becomes as polite as most Texans are when that happens, and I believe it will. An armed society is a polite society.




Popular posts from this blog

Were The Founding Fathers Aided By Aliens?

Photo: Sebastian Bieniek, Dollarfaces https://www.b1en1ek.com/works/bieniek-paint/2015-dollarfaces/

The American Tea Party 2009: Goals, Objectives, and Principles

Image by André Karwath ( CC ) I do not presume to be the mouthpiece or leader of the 21st century American Tea Party movement, so the following is a summary of my personal vision for the modern American Tea Party, a list of objectives I believe it should seek to accomplish, and a set of principles I believe it should strive to embody. I am writing this because the Tea Party movement will fail to create real change unless it finds direction in sound principles and takes specific, practical steps to ensure the implementation of those principles in public policy. I. Principles Any political movement is doomed to failure so long as it is merely fighting for a particular, isolated policy preference or even a set of such preferences, absent of any context and underived from or related to a unified framework for viewing reality, humankind's role in reality, and government's role in humanity. The following (originally published in the Dec. 2008 article " Six Reasons Not To Bailo...

IRS Admits Targeting Tea Party!

You think Matt Drudge is just being hysterical in that screenshot above? With that ALL CAPS headline about the IRS? Being hysterical, while trying to sell you chocolate covered strawberries for Mother's Day? Well guess again, because you know this is seriously crazy when even the AP is using all caps for their headline , and filing it under a subdomain called "bigstory": The AP says : The Internal Revenue Service inappropriately flagged conservative political groups for additional reviews during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status, a top IRS official said Friday. Organizations were singled out because they included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their applications for tax-exempt status, said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups. In some cases, groups were asked for their list of donors, which violates IRS policy in most cases, she said. "That was wrong. T...
–––As Featured On–––