Skip to main content

This Post Is Dedicated to All The Feminists Who Say Santa Should Be Female or Gender Neutral

Source

A recent survey of 4,000 people in the U.S. and U.K. found that 27 percent of respondents believe Santa Clause should be a woman or gender neutral.

This is just a fake news story to get conservatives triggered.


Okay, listen–– anybody who's saying this story is fake news by triggered conservatives: First of all you can follow the link at the beginning of this post. The survey was absolutely real.

I do understand what you're saying that manufactured outrages, panics, and moral crusades, even when they're based on something that is technically true like this survey result, are basically the definition of fake news as a literary or television genre, which unfortunately, is pretty much all news, including mainstream media. Actually especially mainstream media.

But this story is not fake news. There is something real and crazy going on in our culture, and the people triggered by this story are aware of it: And that is–– Feminism is making people crazy.

Santa is a man. That's not sexist. That's not misogynistic. It's not saying men are better. It's just saying Santa is a man.

It's okay for there to be men.

Why does it even matter? Santa isn't even real.


I know! That's what I'm saying. Feminists are crazy.

Who's worried about 27%? Man Santa won in a landslide.


27% is one in four people bro. Of the next three people you walk past, one of those people is crazy!

Is there nothing better to do than argue over a fictional character?


Nope. This is America. And it's Christmastime. If we can't argue over Santa at Christmastime, then I guess the terrorists have won.

Speaking of which, saying Santa should be a woman is a total joke. But you know what would be totally woke?

Saying Mohammad should be a woman.

I would like to see 'em run that survey.




Odin, in his guise as a wanderer, by Georg von Rosen (1886)

Odin, Der Göttervater

Popular posts from this blog

Occupy Mordor or Destroy the Ring?

There has been mixed responses to Occupy Wall Street by libertarians. Some see the movement as a positive, while others see them as little more than lazy hipsters. But libertarians must be sensitive to why people feel the way they do about issues. The occupiers point out a legitimate concern that "the 1%" control vastly more power and wealth than "the 99%", and corporations have accumulated more power and privilege than is healthy for an open society. Some other concerns and demands are absurd, but the heart of the matter is on track. The question is why has this happened? While many on the left are quick to blame a nebulous thing called "greed", or lack of regulation, the matter is more complicated than that. This calls for a Lord of the Rings metaphor. Let's say that Sauron, the big cheese bad guy of Lord of the Rings, is the corporate hegemony. The 1%. Most people in Middle Earth agree that this is a problem, but there are a few differ...

I've Been an Outspoken Critic of Censoring Conservatives, But I'm Not Leaving Patreon Over Sargon of Akkad's Ridiculous Remarks

By: Wes Messamore The Humble Libertarian Photo: Gage Skidmore

Were The Founding Fathers Aided By Aliens?

Photo: Sebastian Bieniek, Dollarfaces https://www.b1en1ek.com/works/bieniek-paint/2015-dollarfaces/ Edit (2/1/26): No
–––As Featured On–––