Skip to main content

The Injustice of Modern Warfare

I apologize for my absence from THL as of late, I've been preoccupied. But I have the pleasure of introducing a new writer today, by the name of Samantha Lindsay. She's a new contributor to The Libertarian Review. Here's her first piece on the injustice of modern warfare. Scroll to the bottom to see part 2.
Modern warfare involves the use of weapons of mass destruction ranging from the smallest bombs to nuclear weapons and cannot be limited to those individuals taking part in the conflict. Therefore, it necessarily leads to the deaths of thousands of innocent men, women, and children. Thus, the libertarian not only opposes modern warfare, but also dares to call it what it is; mass murder. Further, because wars must be funded, and as the nation-states that take part in inter-State wars do not produce anything with which to fund their wars, they must tax the people that they govern to fund their wars. Not only do they tax those who support their wars, but they also tax those who are opposed to war. Clearly then, those who are opposed to the war are having their property taken from them without their consent to fund a war that they do not wish to fund. In addition, as refusal to pay a tax that is required by the state in question is punishable by severe penalties, the taxation in question is coercion that is backed with the threat of violent force. In every other area of life, taking something from someone against his will and using the threat of violence to insure cooperation, is defined as robbery! Thus, the libertarian views taxation as state-sponsored robbery.
Read the rest here
The Libertarian Review
Drew Martin, Blogger, THL Articles

Popular posts from this blog

My 2011 Trip

Hey Patriots! Hope your New Year is off to a good start! I am multitasking my head off to prepare for a trip around the country of indefinite length and scope starting next week. I'll be headed for Colorado first where I'll investigate medical cannabis laws and their effects; then I'll be flying out to Washington DC for the month of February to attend CPAC and ISFLC; and after that I'll move north to New Hampshire to spend March hanging with members of the Free State Project and learning more about it. I'm not positive what's next after that, but I've got a general inkling, and it might involve venturing overseas to learn a little more about the broader world around us and relay everything I see to you readers here at The Humble Libertarian ! Wish me luck and keep your eye out for updates as I travel. Peace, Wes Wes Messamore , Editor in Chief, T H L Articles | Author's Page

Occupy Mordor or Destroy the Ring?

There has been mixed responses to Occupy Wall Street by libertarians. Some see the movement as a positive, while others see them as little more than lazy hipsters. But libertarians must be sensitive to why people feel the way they do about issues. The occupiers point out a legitimate concern that "the 1%" control vastly more power and wealth than "the 99%", and corporations have accumulated more power and privilege than is healthy for an open society. Some other concerns and demands are absurd, but the heart of the matter is on track. The question is why has this happened? While many on the left are quick to blame a nebulous thing called "greed", or lack of regulation, the matter is more complicated than that. This calls for a Lord of the Rings metaphor. Let's say that Sauron, the big cheese bad guy of Lord of the Rings, is the corporate hegemony. The 1%. Most people in Middle Earth agree that this is a problem, but there are a few differ...

I've Been an Outspoken Critic of Censoring Conservatives, But I'm Not Leaving Patreon Over Sargon of Akkad's Ridiculous Remarks

By: Wes Messamore The Humble Libertarian Photo: Gage Skidmore
–––As Featured On–––