Skip to main content

Is It Fair to Punish Dharun Ravi Because Tyler Clementi Died?

This is a tragic but legally fascinating case. Ravi violated the privacy of homosexual Clementi by secretly filming a Clementi gay sex encounter. Clementi was so distraught that he committed suicide. There are several issues going on here. Is Ravi in any way responsible for Clementi's suicide? If so, what's the crime? Ravi isn't being charged with killing Clementi but he is being charged with a hate crime that carries a sentence of up to ten years. We've always had mean and nasty people who do mean and nasty things but the Internet provides a venue to permanently blast embarrassing and private matters into cyberspace for all eternity (Anthony Weiner's weiner and Andrew Breitbart's role in making a photo of Weiner's junk go viral comes to mind). While the government violates our right to privacy all day long, the right to privacy is anything but legally clear.
... Ravi is on trial for what all of us feel from time to time: prejudice against those who are different from us....Why? Because while Ravi is on trial for invasion of privacy, the more serious offense with which he is charged is “bias intimidation,” a hate crime. If all Ravi did was film Clementi in bed with another man, it’s a minor offense. If he did so in order to harass Clementi for being gay, he could get 10 years in prison. As the trial has unfolded, there appears to be general agreement that Ravi is a bit of a jerk...Of course, this trial is taking place only because shortly after Ravi recorded him, Clementi killed himself by jumping off the George Washington Bridge. That’s why the case has attracted so much attention: Clementi was one in a series of gay-teen suicides brought on by bullying and intimidation. Now both Clementi and Ravi are symbols. And yet, is Ravi really responsible for Clementi’s suicide?"

Read the rest here 
The Daily Beast

Popular posts from this blog

Occupy Mordor or Destroy the Ring?

There has been mixed responses to Occupy Wall Street by libertarians. Some see the movement as a positive, while others see them as little more than lazy hipsters. But libertarians must be sensitive to why people feel the way they do about issues. The occupiers point out a legitimate concern that "the 1%" control vastly more power and wealth than "the 99%", and corporations have accumulated more power and privilege than is healthy for an open society. Some other concerns and demands are absurd, but the heart of the matter is on track. The question is why has this happened? While many on the left are quick to blame a nebulous thing called "greed", or lack of regulation, the matter is more complicated than that. This calls for a Lord of the Rings metaphor. Let's say that Sauron, the big cheese bad guy of Lord of the Rings, is the corporate hegemony. The 1%. Most people in Middle Earth agree that this is a problem, but there are a few differ...

I've Been an Outspoken Critic of Censoring Conservatives, But I'm Not Leaving Patreon Over Sargon of Akkad's Ridiculous Remarks

By: Wes Messamore The Humble Libertarian Photo: Gage Skidmore

Were The Founding Fathers Aided By Aliens?

Photo: Sebastian Bieniek, Dollarfaces https://www.b1en1ek.com/works/bieniek-paint/2015-dollarfaces/ Edit (2/1/26): No
–––As Featured On–––