Skip to main content

Just Because She's Into Ron Paul Doesn't Mean She's Into You

By: Eric Sharp

I have been called to state that which should be obvious and that hopefully most libertarians realize:
Just because she's into Ron Paul does not mean that she's into you.

love ron paul not you
That's right I said it. I've been compelled to say so after hearing of a few hopefully isolated incidents in which otherwise respectable men in the liberty movement have been a little creepy and slimeballish, macking a little too hard and not taking a hint.

Hopefully you are not one of these people. Maybe you've behaved this way without realizing it and feel pretty bad.
feels bad man
If you're part of the liberty movement then I would hope that you are not an unrepentant jerk.

But let it be said that if we want our movement to be a vibrant, rich, and diverse one then we will need to be self aware and aware of the actions of others within our movement.

We all want to be with someone who shares our values and doesn't think that we are crazy for our political beliefs. It is natural, on occasion, for interests and crushes to develop within groups and movements.

But ...

There are respectful ways to express that and there are creepy and inappropriate ways to express that.

Nominally supporting the political rights of women is not the same thing as acting respectfully towards them. Being a gender libertarian requires a bit more than that.

Using a mutual interest in a political figure or philosophy as a direct pathway to a date (or a bed) is not ok. Messaging a female leader in our movement over facebook or text constantly or inappropriately is not ok.
good flirt bad flirt
*Forgive the syrupy and mono-ethnic images, it's a feat to find PC images of "flirting".

Not only is it not ok, but behaving this way flies in the face of what libertarianism really truly stands for: respecting one another.

This is particularly important because people join groups and stay in groups because of the sense of belonging and community derived. If you or someone else is destroying the trust between members of the group by intentionally or unintentionally acting chauvanistically or pigish then you are also destroying the fabric of what makes the liberty movement great.

Having organized with people across the political spectrum, individualists have been the nicest and most pleasant group because they respect you as an individual and actually care and listen to you as a person- not just as part of their vanguard or as a "comrade".

So please promote and protect that person to person relationship that exists within our unique movement and don't destroy it by getting carried away by one's passions.




Eric Sharp
,
Regular Columnist, THL
Articles | Author's Page

Popular posts from this blog

My 2011 Trip

Hey Patriots! Hope your New Year is off to a good start! I am multitasking my head off to prepare for a trip around the country of indefinite length and scope starting next week. I'll be headed for Colorado first where I'll investigate medical cannabis laws and their effects; then I'll be flying out to Washington DC for the month of February to attend CPAC and ISFLC; and after that I'll move north to New Hampshire to spend March hanging with members of the Free State Project and learning more about it. I'm not positive what's next after that, but I've got a general inkling, and it might involve venturing overseas to learn a little more about the broader world around us and relay everything I see to you readers here at The Humble Libertarian ! Wish me luck and keep your eye out for updates as I travel. Peace, Wes Wes Messamore , Editor in Chief, T H L Articles | Author's Page

Occupy Mordor or Destroy the Ring?

There has been mixed responses to Occupy Wall Street by libertarians. Some see the movement as a positive, while others see them as little more than lazy hipsters. But libertarians must be sensitive to why people feel the way they do about issues. The occupiers point out a legitimate concern that "the 1%" control vastly more power and wealth than "the 99%", and corporations have accumulated more power and privilege than is healthy for an open society. Some other concerns and demands are absurd, but the heart of the matter is on track. The question is why has this happened? While many on the left are quick to blame a nebulous thing called "greed", or lack of regulation, the matter is more complicated than that. This calls for a Lord of the Rings metaphor. Let's say that Sauron, the big cheese bad guy of Lord of the Rings, is the corporate hegemony. The 1%. Most people in Middle Earth agree that this is a problem, but there are a few differ...

I've Been an Outspoken Critic of Censoring Conservatives, But I'm Not Leaving Patreon Over Sargon of Akkad's Ridiculous Remarks

By: Wes Messamore The Humble Libertarian Photo: Gage Skidmore
–––As Featured On–––