Skip to main content

The problem with Mitt Romney's religion... is that he isn't Mormon ENOUGH?

I'm glad I featured this Salon piece recently, as I've gotten a lot of responses from The Humble Libertarian's Mormon readers, who say if Romney adhered more closely to his church's principles, he'd be more libertarian and a more acceptable candidate.

Reader Carla writes:

I'm Mormon. The White Horse Prophecy is considered more urban legend than actual prophecy by Joseph Smith. The Church officially distances itself from it. So whoever wrote this is missing some key facts.

Including the one where most Mormons support Ron Paul, not Mitt Romney.

And:

Romney definitely goes against official Church doctrine and scriptures all the time. The principle of agency is one of the most basic and important elements of our faith and he doesn't seem to believe in it himself. It leaves me and every other Mormon I know scratching our heads as to where he gets his politics.

And yes, Mormons support Ron Paul in droves. I don't know of a single person who supports Romney.

Reader wurzel writes:

There are three reasons not to worry about Romney trying to establish a theocracy, or taking his direction from Salt Lake City, or whatever the latest scare-myth is.

1) From our Articles of Faith, we believe in "honoring, sustaining, and obeying the law." This is particularly interesting as the church has grown from primarily US-based to world-wide, and has to function within many jurisdictions.

2) Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints have a deeply ingrained concept of stewardship. When one is given responsibility, be it for ones family, a church ward, a job at work, or a political office, we believe we'll be held accountable before God for how well we performed our duties, given the circumstances we were dealt. If Romney accepts a job with the description, "Protect and defend the Constitution" I believe he'll do it.

3) LDS scripture explicitly approves of our Constitution as inspired, and our land as a free land. Furthermore, the scriptures condemn using force to compel others, but rather, persuasion, longsuffering, and patience.

A really good book just came out called LDS Liberty which has many citations from scripture and modern prophets demonstrating why a libertarian society is most in line with LDS doctrine. Indeed, we believe the whole reason we are here on earth is that we fought a war in the preexistence in favor of free choice.

So, perhaps one could say that Romney's Mormon-ness isn't worrisome so much as the extent to which he deviates from it for political reasons?

After reading these responses from two professing Mormon readers, I can't help but think, Gee I wish Mitt Romney was MORE committed to his Mormon beliefs. Maybe then, he'd make a better political candidate!

PS: Do any of my Mormon readers happen to know, are there any good Mormon liberty candidates or politicians out there?




Wes Messamore,
Editor in Chief, THL
Articles | Author's Page

Popular posts from this blog

Obama keeps pushing the bipartisan religion of interventionism

Michael Scheuer is deadly accurate - foreign interventionism is a bipartisan religion (or disease, whichever you prefer). Too often, I believe, Americans think about Washington’s interventionism only as the actual physical intervention of U.S. military forces abroad in places where no U.S. interest is at risk. That activity certainly is intervention, but President Obama’s despicable decision last week to have his administration leak intelligence claiming that Israel has concluded an agreement with the government of Azerbaijan to allow its use of Azeri airfields for an air strike on Iran is just as much an unwarranted intervention by the United States government. Readers of this blog will know that I carry no brief for Israel, that I believe it is a state that is irrelevant to U.S. national interests, and one whose U.S.-citizen supporters are disloyal to America and involved in activities that compromise U.S. security and corrupt the U.S. political system. That said, Israel — l...

How Thorough a Brainwashing

Saw this on Facebook: Left this comment: It's more thorough of a wash job than that. They don't just believe they are not brainwashed, the question has never occurred to them and as long as they keep reading TIME and watching MTV, it's *impossible* for the question to occur to them. Oh brave new world, that has such people in it. EDIT: And one more thing-- don't ever stop considering what questions it is currently impossible to occur to you . This is what I've been thinking about a lot lately and I'm worried just how large and numerous my own blindspots are. The only solution is to be as intellectually curious as possible. To learn voraciously. To read things that challenge us. To read things that are hard for us to understand and then try to understand them. To expose ourselves to ideas far removed from our present culture and place on the timeline. Read old books. Read foreign books. Turn off the TV. You have already absorbed its biases and blindspots. ...

How To Gain More Twitter Followers

Earlier today, I wrote : "My goal is to write a book before the end of March. My goal is to spend no more than a week from start to publication, spending as much time as I need in order to get it done during that week. My goal is to give it away to you for free here on HumbleLibertarian.com. What's a goal you have? Something you may have been putting off for years? Something you could accomplish in one month if you were determined? If it's near-term enough of a goal, and specific enough of a goal, and you share it in the comments below, feel free to tell me how I can help you and I'll do whatever I can. If it's a libertarian / news / politics-related goal, my manner of help would be easy to determine. I could promote it, introduce you to someone via email, (etc.). If it's something apolitical like quit smoking cigarettes, start exercising, learn guitar, start a business, gain more Twitter followers, learn another language, eat a paleo diet, or...
–––As Featured On–––