Skip to main content

Shall We Abolish Civil Courts?

"This week the Senate has been debating S. 1867, The National Defense Authorization Act, co-sponsored by John McCain and Carl Levin. Defenders of the legislation claim it is a codification of ten years of counter-terrorism policy in the United States. Detractors claim the legislation would allow the military to arrest and indefinitely detain anyone suspected of terrorism, including an American citizen.

"According to a Washington Post editorial written by the co-sponsors, the legislation does not expand “the authority under which detainees can be held under custody.” National Review’s Andrew McCarthy claims S. 1867 “does not change existing laws in any meaningful way.” But fellow supporter Lindsey Graham claimed the bill would allow indefinite detention “American citizen or not” because the bill will “basically say in law for the first time that the homeland is part of the battlefield. . . .

"Shall we just abolish civil courts? If the objective is to get a conviction we are certainly more likely to get guilty verdicts in military courts so why not abolish civil courts and try everyone at Guantanamo Bay where a guilty verdict is almost assured?"

Read the rest of my article at the RevoluTimes.


Carl Wicklander,
Regular Columnist, THL
Articles Author's Page Website

Popular posts from this blog

My 2011 Trip

Hey Patriots! Hope your New Year is off to a good start! I am multitasking my head off to prepare for a trip around the country of indefinite length and scope starting next week. I'll be headed for Colorado first where I'll investigate medical cannabis laws and their effects; then I'll be flying out to Washington DC for the month of February to attend CPAC and ISFLC; and after that I'll move north to New Hampshire to spend March hanging with members of the Free State Project and learning more about it. I'm not positive what's next after that, but I've got a general inkling, and it might involve venturing overseas to learn a little more about the broader world around us and relay everything I see to you readers here at The Humble Libertarian ! Wish me luck and keep your eye out for updates as I travel. Peace, Wes Wes Messamore , Editor in Chief, T H L Articles | Author's Page

I've Been an Outspoken Critic of Censoring Conservatives, But I'm Not Leaving Patreon Over Sargon of Akkad's Ridiculous Remarks

By: Wes Messamore The Humble Libertarian Photo: Gage Skidmore

Occupy Mordor or Destroy the Ring?

There has been mixed responses to Occupy Wall Street by libertarians. Some see the movement as a positive, while others see them as little more than lazy hipsters. But libertarians must be sensitive to why people feel the way they do about issues. The occupiers point out a legitimate concern that "the 1%" control vastly more power and wealth than "the 99%", and corporations have accumulated more power and privilege than is healthy for an open society. Some other concerns and demands are absurd, but the heart of the matter is on track. The question is why has this happened? While many on the left are quick to blame a nebulous thing called "greed", or lack of regulation, the matter is more complicated than that. This calls for a Lord of the Rings metaphor. Let's say that Sauron, the big cheese bad guy of Lord of the Rings, is the corporate hegemony. The 1%. Most people in Middle Earth agree that this is a problem, but there are a few differ...
–––As Featured On–––