Skip to main content

What Really Happens When Washington Hits The Debt Ceiling

As talks over raising the debt ceiling break down over Democratic demands for tax hikes, government officials and media commentators are trying to scare Americans into believing that without raising the debt ceiling, the Federal government will have to default on its obligations:

The talks were aimed at striking a budget deal in hopes of easing the way for Congress to raise the government's $14.29 trillion debt limit. Treasury Department officials say that without additional borrowing authority, the government will run out of cash to pay its bills by Aug. 2. They warn that defaulting on any U.S. obligations could trigger another financial crisis and recession.

But Senator Rand Paul has been saying for months now that this is untrue. Rand Paul argues:

"Our interest payment is about $20 billion a month. Our tax revenue is about $200 billion a month, so we're bringing in (nearly) $200 billion. We've got plenty of money to pay our interest."

Unlike the extreme bickering partisan factions that each say it's our way or a government shut down, Rand Paul argues for a moderate middle path, explaining that the government can continue to pay its obligations with its monthly receivables while responsibly determining which elements of its perpetual bloat should be removed.

Whether or not you are philosophically committed to a government that takes an active role in providing for its citizens' welfare, there can be no denying that the government wastes a LOT of money. Borrowing more in order to subsidize corruption, waste, malfeasance, and corporate lobbying is criminally irresponsible. Instead of borrowing more, the government can spend less without going into default.


Wes Messamore,
Editor in Chief, THL
Articles | Author's Page

Popular posts from this blog

Occupy Mordor or Destroy the Ring?

There has been mixed responses to Occupy Wall Street by libertarians. Some see the movement as a positive, while others see them as little more than lazy hipsters. But libertarians must be sensitive to why people feel the way they do about issues. The occupiers point out a legitimate concern that "the 1%" control vastly more power and wealth than "the 99%", and corporations have accumulated more power and privilege than is healthy for an open society. Some other concerns and demands are absurd, but the heart of the matter is on track. The question is why has this happened? While many on the left are quick to blame a nebulous thing called "greed", or lack of regulation, the matter is more complicated than that. This calls for a Lord of the Rings metaphor. Let's say that Sauron, the big cheese bad guy of Lord of the Rings, is the corporate hegemony. The 1%. Most people in Middle Earth agree that this is a problem, but there are a few differ...

I've Been an Outspoken Critic of Censoring Conservatives, But I'm Not Leaving Patreon Over Sargon of Akkad's Ridiculous Remarks

By: Wes Messamore The Humble Libertarian Photo: Gage Skidmore

My 2011 Trip

Hey Patriots! Hope your New Year is off to a good start! I am multitasking my head off to prepare for a trip around the country of indefinite length and scope starting next week. I'll be headed for Colorado first where I'll investigate medical cannabis laws and their effects; then I'll be flying out to Washington DC for the month of February to attend CPAC and ISFLC; and after that I'll move north to New Hampshire to spend March hanging with members of the Free State Project and learning more about it. I'm not positive what's next after that, but I've got a general inkling, and it might involve venturing overseas to learn a little more about the broader world around us and relay everything I see to you readers here at The Humble Libertarian ! Wish me luck and keep your eye out for updates as I travel. Peace, Wes Wes Messamore , Editor in Chief, T H L Articles | Author's Page
–––As Featured On–––