Skip to main content

Nancy Pelosi Says She'll Get the Votes, Ram Through Health Care via Reconciliation

It emerged today (h.t. Memeorandum) that "Speaker Nancy Pelosi says she is confident she will be able to get the votes needed to pass sweeping health care legislation in the House, even if it threatens the political careers of some members of her party."

She even seems willing to sacrifice Democratic House seats in the mid-term election this Fall in order to get the Democrats' national price-fixing scheme passed. In an interview Sunday (h.t. Memeorandum), "House Speaker Nancy Pelosi urged her colleagues to back a major overhaul of U.S. health care even if it threatens their political careers, a call to arms that underscores the issue's massive role in this election year."

Nancy Pelosi's Fatal Conceit...

Speaker Pelosi went on to argue that "Lawmakers sometimes must enact policies that, even if unpopular at the moment, will help the public." Seriously Madame Speaker? So what you're saying is that even if the public doesn't want more forcible intrusion into their health care, Congress should do it anyway because you and the rest of the Democrats know what's best for us better than We The People do?

Democrats Commit Political Suicide

Senator Lamar Alexander is calling the reconciliation debacle a political kamikaze mission (h.t. Memeorandum): "It would be a political kamikaze mission for the Democratic Party if they jam this through after the American people have been saying."

I absolutely love the analogy because if you'll remember, the end goal of a kamikaze strike is to destroy. The Democrats' health care "reform" will be overwhelmingly destructive to the interests of consumers, workers, patients, and doctors. Mark my words, it will smash the well-being of working class Americans into a million pieces.

Barack Obama Wants Reconciliation

The big word Democrats aren't saying, is reconciliation, but they are planning to use it. An Obama adviser revealed (h.t. Memeorandum) that the administration is leading the charge for the Democrats' "kamikaze mission," it's preferred method being reconciliation, a parliamentary procedure that would allow the Senate to pass health insurance price-fixing with only 51, rather than the usual 60 votes.

The Left Coast Rebel has the right idea, when he says that the American public is suspicious of sneaky parliamentary procedures to enact policies that most Americans oppose, and that the Democrats are using their classic propaganda techniques to soften the blow to their image. Instead of calling it by the name Americans have come to know and hate it by, the Democrats are calling reconciliation "a simple majority."

Thus, Congress will pass PelosiCare by "a simple majority," which sounds nicer than reconciliation, a desperate parliamentary trick that many Democrats are on record criticizing as undemocratic back when the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress.

Rep. Paul Ryan (R) at Healthcare Summit

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) has the right idea in the video below, showing his opening remarks at Obama's health care summit last week. He cuts straight to the problem with the Democrats' legislation when he says "This bill does not control costs. This bill does not reduce deficits. Instead this bill adds a new health entitlement at a time when we have no idea to pay for the entitlements we already have."

He explains furthermore, that it's full of fiscal tricks that mask the increased spending, including ten years of tax increases on the order of half a trillion dollars and ten years of Medicare cuts on the order of half a trillion dollars (and yes you read that right- ten years of Medicare cuts amounting to roughly half a trillion dollars). Watch the whole video below:

Popular posts from this blog

My 2011 Trip

Hey Patriots! Hope your New Year is off to a good start! I am multitasking my head off to prepare for a trip around the country of indefinite length and scope starting next week. I'll be headed for Colorado first where I'll investigate medical cannabis laws and their effects; then I'll be flying out to Washington DC for the month of February to attend CPAC and ISFLC; and after that I'll move north to New Hampshire to spend March hanging with members of the Free State Project and learning more about it. I'm not positive what's next after that, but I've got a general inkling, and it might involve venturing overseas to learn a little more about the broader world around us and relay everything I see to you readers here at The Humble Libertarian ! Wish me luck and keep your eye out for updates as I travel. Peace, Wes Wes Messamore , Editor in Chief, T H L Articles | Author's Page

Occupy Mordor or Destroy the Ring?

There has been mixed responses to Occupy Wall Street by libertarians. Some see the movement as a positive, while others see them as little more than lazy hipsters. But libertarians must be sensitive to why people feel the way they do about issues. The occupiers point out a legitimate concern that "the 1%" control vastly more power and wealth than "the 99%", and corporations have accumulated more power and privilege than is healthy for an open society. Some other concerns and demands are absurd, but the heart of the matter is on track. The question is why has this happened? While many on the left are quick to blame a nebulous thing called "greed", or lack of regulation, the matter is more complicated than that. This calls for a Lord of the Rings metaphor. Let's say that Sauron, the big cheese bad guy of Lord of the Rings, is the corporate hegemony. The 1%. Most people in Middle Earth agree that this is a problem, but there are a few differ...

I've Been an Outspoken Critic of Censoring Conservatives, But I'm Not Leaving Patreon Over Sargon of Akkad's Ridiculous Remarks

By: Wes Messamore The Humble Libertarian Photo: Gage Skidmore
–––As Featured On–––